From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal to include obligatory PGP verification of packages from any repository Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:02:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20201016130235.06218dae@argon> <87eelvplvh.fsf@posteo.net> <10bdf4ea-e365-cc3d-ec03-4348946fadbe@yandex.ru> <20201019124335.GC19325@protected.rcdrun.com> <20201019163827.GG19325@protected.rcdrun.com> <20201019174745.GJ19325@protected.rcdrun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23069"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "Philip K." , rms@gnu.org, thibaut.verron@gmail.com, mve1@runbox.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Kangas , Dmitry Gutov To: Jean Louis Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 19 20:03:01 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kUZUr-0005s7-7D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 20:03:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45974 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUZUq-00042P-8J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:03:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUZU3-0003Y5-5D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:02:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:52275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUZU1-0001Ac-3U; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:02:10 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 57EF780CFC; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:02:07 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E95AC8057E; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:02:05 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1603130525; bh=wV28NLtq6qJ/biRTn1zu2xLqGIZNrQpqw++wLP1n0U0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=DiDHjJKs7wTYPqqDXswDKBFfMP4nR9+Dm3OMTP3+GFxt9sNRK4ZTHFm16gjy0I4F5 Web5dJ+CNshwVkcjaYirEqjmGW+3gtqMSPNauySMcsJ7NkfnMrEytR7KmQJ0SYOoiR 3TneLKOKazzHuhWTix06/hh3FxBqpSDXSnOIrLmqQdhK3wVe3NgHvG5KxR77ftvzqs Oz7iaKYV1kxZ7fQx5j0qsATWeUm0h4eoqEtWdQuHC2Bo5xWbUl5LLCQ0rdxx5r4pP2 3XQp1ahENDBYPNuCtfRr+ZN3wI3ip6PbTDV5jVZ0azLekz0mzlv5vuwBZZaFbpag4r 2UDPJ+AiOGFpw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [157.52.9.240]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EE5D120308; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:02:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20201019174745.GJ19325@protected.rcdrun.com> (Jean Louis's message of "Mon, 19 Oct 2020 20:47:45 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/19 13:18:36 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:258138 Archived-At: > tried installing some from ELPA and did not see any difference. What difference did you expect to see? > There are just few well known, ELPA, Org and MELPA. Again, there is no ELPA archive named "ELPA". Please try and avoid spreading the confusion between ELPA and GNU ELPA. Stefan