From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug-reference-prog-mode slows down CC Mode's scrolling by ~7% Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2021 12:40:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <838s0eyyjg.fsf@gnu.org> <83eea5ygub.fsf@gnu.org> <835yvgyijv.fsf@gnu.org> <83eea4wilj.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6kswfsh.fsf@gnu.org> <83y28cuxoc.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfykuwxy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13592"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 04 18:42:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mMYkd-0003MX-C5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 18:42:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45936 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMYkc-00069O-Bd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 12:42:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55102) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMYis-0003mi-04 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 12:40:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:54115) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMYip-0003mA-MJ; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 12:40:53 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 14872100136; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 12:40:50 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CDDC01000CF; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 12:40:48 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1630773648; bh=BRgZLAO7Kj32IC/VK0+w/Bxl0AGGmarVuWmSshAVjtw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=IrD9VdlVuhPbxFHbyqlod4ljXQulPgVTKgtFOwmB84PKATgykjBzNllvreNUiwfjE cA5SDH1l96gY/3yA3wmhiJrcI8tgBj1A+JigAvi7xVPzRkAYkYG1HnlY3KGwocnuzM i4gCWKUO6/67ZvN6Qt2hdQi8ZCYUtBOfRN4g3dkt30wKAgEMQwU0PZOyHByXg/PhbW 7CY85dmB/3MbjVP1368ikGcgXt15ohMxX2fGRK9+5tn3YhxePPDy9DHkAbnuZBU+sP 8QZt/KOi+d4HdFbPcMSofnf/8sV9fKLzhxihABL94zQb85LKLK6QFqmsMszj7P8O3W vEdejoamUUklA== Original-Received: from milanesa (unknown [104.247.244.135]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 847BC120328; Sat, 4 Sep 2021 12:40:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83sfykuwxy.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 04 Sep 2021 19:28:41 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273930 Archived-At: > I tried to explain it many times, and evidently failed. Perhaps > because I'm surprised I need to explain something like that. That's why I think it's likely a misunderstanding: for both of us the other's position is completely opposed to something we take as obvious. Stefan