From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: font-lock-negation-char-face Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 18:32:04 -0400 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1115418846 2926 80.91.229.2 (6 May 2005 22:34:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 22:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 07 00:34:04 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DUBOA-0006qF-36 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 May 2005 00:33:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DUBVx-00026N-JH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2005 18:41:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DUBTI-0001Ay-8g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2005 18:39:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DUBTC-000182-Fn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2005 18:38:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DUBTA-00012P-Lo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2005 18:38:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DUBS1-0001qB-Q1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2005 18:37:41 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89FB34000B; Fri, 6 May 2005 18:32:08 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BACA4AC008; Fri, 6 May 2005 18:32:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 643D1E6C20; Fri, 6 May 2005 18:32:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-4.84, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, AWL 0.06, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36779 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36779 Let me just say that I find this new "feature" dubious. - it makes things even more "angry fruit salad" and thus requires yet more tweaking to make the text legible again. - it's unclear that these specific chars are particular sources of errors. - why not have a more generic name like font-lock-important-detail-face, so it's at least not so absurdly narrow-scoped. Stefan "who's not interested in more lexical highlighting, as opposed to syntactic hilighting"