From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Strange behavior of C-u in the presence of sit-for in p-c-h Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:12:17 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y7rfdmjg.fsf@furball.mit.edu> <87zmbuabq9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161123171 1816 80.91.229.2 (17 Oct 2006 22:12:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 22:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 18 00:12:42 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZxAt-0007Wb-BV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 00:12:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZxAs-0006nM-Ov for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:12:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GZxAe-0006nE-Ta for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:12:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GZxAc-0006my-PA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:12:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZxAc-0006mv-Ml for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:12:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GZxAc-0003hl-06; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:12:22 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1ADD2CEB8F; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:12:21 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EB83FE0; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:12:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 88F416C9B2; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:12:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Chong Yidong In-Reply-To: <87zmbuabq9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Tue\, 17 Oct 2006 17\:11\:58 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60838 Archived-At: > This normally works ok. However, suppose the call to > read_key_sequence in the command loop takes its input from > unread-command-events. (This happens if the input came during a > sit-for in post-command-hook, as in Stefan's original example, or > directly as in the example above.) This kind of "reread input" is > explicitly *not* added to this_command_keys. The rationale for this > is not clear to me, but there may be a good reason since the code > explicitly checks for this; see keyboard.c:789. Then > `universal-argument-other-key' can't see that input. I think I understand, but I can't find the code in keyboard.c. Do you really mean "line 789"? Of which revision? Stefan