From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fwd: follow-mode arg should be optional Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:16:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1184948235 5943 80.91.229.12 (20 Jul 2007 16:17:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 20 18:17:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IBvAB-00020t-0X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:17:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IBvAA-0004az-8y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IBvA6-0004ad-CC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IBvA4-0004a6-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:17:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IBvA4-0004a2-LV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:17:00 -0400 Original-Received: from tomts40.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.97] helo=tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IBvA3-0004Dy-7q; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:16:59 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([74.12.208.65]) by tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20070720161657.FLTI3229.tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net@pastel.home>; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:16:57 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9A5B17FC0; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:16:57 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri\, 20 Jul 2007 09\:42\:16 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:75188 Archived-At: > I don't think that is possible. How could a program tell that the > message you sent, which wasn't sent as a reply to mine, actually > responded to the issue? That would take real AI. Well, your system could easily tell that it's a reply to *his* message. Stefan