From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.0.50; vc: missing done in progress message Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:44:56 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87r6g2zj68.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87tzkx10bz.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <9l7ihs4cut.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87prvj3fg4.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <8763xaieab.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201790740 32059 80.91.229.12 (31 Jan 2008 14:45:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , Ulrich Neumerkel , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 31 15:46:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JKafr-0002cJ-B3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:45:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKafQ-0005eu-09 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:45:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JKaf4-0005OR-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:45:06 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JKaf1-0005M2-5v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:45:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKaf1-0005Lx-1u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:45:03 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JKaex-0000iX-Ea; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:44:59 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CADNuoUfO+J95dGdsb2JhbACQKwEwmVmBAA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,285,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="13448240" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 31 Jan 2008 09:44:58 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([206.248.159.121]) by smtp.pppoe.ca (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id LPX31257; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:44:57 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6FB5D8123; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:44:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8763xaieab.fsf@ambire.localdomain> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:34:52 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87862 Archived-At: > Now I'm confused. Before, i was moderately sure that the > convention (case 3) was universal. Here is a quick survey of a I'm not sure I understand the context of the discussion, but w.r.t user messages, even if this convention is agreed upon, it's not a convention about which the user would want to care. Stefan