From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: start emacs without creating frames and connect with emacsclient later Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:21:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200808131610.m7DGAkvk020047@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218734578 27102 80.91.229.12 (14 Aug 2008 17:22:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 14 19:23:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KTgXb-00045t-Ex for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:23:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45306 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KTgWf-0006j8-2B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:22:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KTgVY-0006QG-FU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KTgVU-0006Oi-Pr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:21:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50794 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KTgVU-0006Oa-K4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:21:04 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-04.arnet.com.ar ([200.45.191.26]:53757) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KTgVU-0001Js-4v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:21:04 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 9657 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2008 17:19:15 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO ceviche.home) (200.117.153.208) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Aug 2008 17:19:15 -0000 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B425B70062; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:21:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:19:05 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102463 Archived-At: > Should something like this go in? We do have a feature freeze, but this > is quite simple, and it completes the multi-tty functionality, which is > one of the major features of 23.1. > I think it should go in > provided you write the text for etc/NEWS AND all the relevant manuals. I strongly suspect that the proposed patch is a bit naive and will need more work to make it work right (the fact that it ends up not calling frame-initialize at all is very suspect). I.e. it will lead to several new bug reports. So I'd rather leave it for 23.2. Seeing how long it took for someone to even try to write the patch, it's not very high priority, Stefan