From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: set-window-dedicated-p argument name Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:34:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <48FEF3DC.6070004@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224682516 10274 80.91.229.12 (22 Oct 2008 13:35:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: martin rudalics , emacs-devel To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 22 15:36:12 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ksdsg-0004ri-UO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:36:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39922 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ksdrb-0007bP-GD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KsdrY-0007am-2E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:35:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KsdrW-0007aU-Ku for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:34:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37855 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KsdrW-0007aR-D1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:34:58 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:61576 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KsdrW-0004hV-Ly for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:34:58 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtoEAFvJ/khFxLrB/2dsb2JhbACBcsRCg0+BCw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,464,1220241600"; d="scan'208";a="28708645" Original-Received: from 69-196-186-193.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.186.193]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2008 09:34:57 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1721A8101; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:34:57 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:04:16 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104842 Archived-At: > I think at the moment the thing to do is consider a window dedicated > whenever FLAG is non-nil. If and when Stefan adds "different levels of > dedication", code affected by window dedication should be revised. Actually, the distinction is there already. What's missing is documentation for it. >> Until now, it was >> possible to do >> >> (set-window-dedicated-p (selected-window) 1) >> >> and the window was _not_ considered dedicated by some functions. > I'd say that is a bug of these functions. No, it's a feature. Stefan