From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: major mode in new buffers Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:06:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: <2f8988ff1003300457w38ee4bf0h259cd7a7187298e0@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269961757 12974 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2010 15:09:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Kyllingstad Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 30 17:09:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nwd3v-0001Wq-VJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:09:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34577 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nwd3v-0002jY-CN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nwd1q-0001sw-02 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:06:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48356 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nwd1l-0001qN-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:06:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nwd1k-0007Iz-JP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:06:49 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:41409) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nwd1k-0007IZ-Cz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:06:48 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o2UF6kS9030518; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:06:46 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 203263A0F4; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:06:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <2f8988ff1003300457w38ee4bf0h259cd7a7187298e0@mail.gmail.com> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Ren=E9?= Kyllingstad"'s message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:57:23 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3501=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122914 Archived-At: > new buffers get default-major-mode. I would find it more convenient if > auto-mode-alist was used. So you create non-file buffer that have names that look like file names? > Is there a disadvantage to that? auto-mode-alist is meant for file-names rather than buffer-names. It might be OK to use it there, tho. Stefan