From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: use of minibuffer in interactive spec code Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:39:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <3E79AA18AD2A4001A33DE551781D3CB1@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274283594 8744 80.91.229.12 (19 May 2010 15:39:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:39:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 19 17:39:52 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OElN9-0001qL-JT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 17:39:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59619 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OElN9-0004Lf-0n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:39:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54712 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OElN3-0004L7-6I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:39:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OElN1-00021G-MH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:39:45 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:56176 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OElN1-000219-IV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:39:43 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAC+j80tMCpz0/2dsb2JhbACdcXK+TIUQBIwv X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,264,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="64567459" Original-Received: from 76-10-156-244.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.156.244]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 19 May 2010 11:39:42 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5AD8C7F40; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:39:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 19 May 2010 05:44:01 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124940 Archived-At: > But as I said, the breakage occurred apparently between the last > pretest and 23.2. I'm confused. Your message seemed to refer to a "last pretest" in january 2009: I don't know if this is a bug or a bug fix. I would like to get some info about it, if possible, to understand better. The behavior in this respect is new in Emacs 23.2. It changed apparently sometime after this build: GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2009-01-15 on LENNART-69DE564 > Since the last pretest was not long before 23.2, and > since you think you were the one who might have broken this, perhaps > you can look at changes you made during that short period. If it's really between the last pretest and 23.2, then I'm not so sure I'd be to blame since I haven't made (m)any changes around that time. Have you tried my recipe? What does it return? Stefan