From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lexbind Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:01:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87sjuulr20.fsf@gmail.com> <87aah2p1s1.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300393680 1329 80.91.229.12 (17 Mar 2011 20:28:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 17 21:27:55 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0JnV-0007NB-Ql for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:27:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33671 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q0JnV-0003EV-84 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:27:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50101 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q0JnO-00039v-07 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:27:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0JnM-0007mL-9I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:27:45 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:48878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0JnM-0007m4-5S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:27:44 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p2HKShd6015813; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:28:43 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4BE0D660B1; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:01:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Thu, 17 Mar 2011 02:59:38 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3799=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9286 : core <3799> : streams <609626> : uri <829357> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137367 Archived-At: > I just had one while running under GDB, so I Ctrl-C and I got the > attached backtrace. Hmm... the lexbind branch does not touch the redisplay code at all, so this is perplexing. My best guess so far is that some part of the changed C code corrupts some part of the memory, leading to the inf-loop. Stefan