From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs RPC security Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:38:44 -0300 Message-ID: References: <87d3kal0za.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o5mky4o.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303756736 29655 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2011 18:38:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:38:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 25 20:38:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQgN-0006c7-Sd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:38:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53529 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQgN-0000vW-By for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:38:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQgK-0000vA-9Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:38:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQgJ-0001VP-BR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:38:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:55601) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQgJ-0001VK-9m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:38:47 -0400 Original-Received: from 121-249-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.249.121]:38681 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQgI-0001Wp-OW; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:38:47 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CD1776610E; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:38:44 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: <874o5mky4o.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:02:31 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138756 Archived-At: > Of course, since the security is so weak right now, no one is using it > outside a limited one-user so you haven't seen any unusual cases. I > would use it personally as a remote password server so all my > auth-source data doesn't live on all the machines I use. I would also > use it to implement a remote synchronization facility for Gnus and BBDB. Still sound like "single user" cases to me. Stefan