From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: more url-utils? Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 11:40:40 -0300 Message-ID: References: <87fwogaxzb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87mxilezg8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87boz0eov8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mxikrulm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871uzw5asv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87boyzcv0o.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k4dnassv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878vu23lpe.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305816056 4738 80.91.229.12 (19 May 2011 14:40:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:40:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ted Zlatanov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: joakim@verona.se Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 19 16:40:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QN4PB-0006z6-LZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:40:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36704 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QN4PA-0004Ri-O0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:40:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QN4P8-0004RY-7M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:40:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QN4P7-0001nE-9p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:40:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:47912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QN4P7-0001nA-72 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:40:45 -0400 Original-Received: from 213-159-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.159.213]:49779 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QN4P6-0001SU-8q; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:40:44 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DD7DE66230; Thu, 19 May 2011 11:40:40 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: (joakim@verona.se's message of "Thu, 19 May 2011 16:11:18 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139520 Archived-At: > This seems ok from my user-viewpoint. OTOH I wouldnt mind handling > protocol errors with exceptions. Its what one does in many other > languages anyway. For synchronous calls, signalling exceptions would be a better solution indeed. But that doesn't work nearly as well for the asynchronous case. Stefan