From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: more url-utils? Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 09:45:58 -0300 Message-ID: References: <87boz0eov8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mxikrulm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871uzw5asv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87boyzcv0o.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k4dnassv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878vu23lpe.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306845975 6007 80.91.229.12 (31 May 2011 12:46:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 12:46:15 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 31 14:46:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QROKk-0001B3-Jq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 14:46:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42345 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QROKk-0003Hy-7e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:46:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34587) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QROKh-0003Ht-2r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:46:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QROKg-0001mT-4j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:33653) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QROKg-0001mO-1a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from 213-159-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.159.213]:60684 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QROKf-0003wf-Eg; Tue, 31 May 2011 08:46:01 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DC7CD660D3; Tue, 31 May 2011 09:45:58 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 31 May 2011 12:15:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139964 Archived-At: >> Oh, wait, no, because I wanted url-fetch to insert the result in the >> current-buffer, rather than creating a brand new buffer. > Yeah, that makes sense, perhaps. In the async case too? Yes. > Hm. Are there any charset issues? I don't know what you're referring to. > I mean, if you're fetching an image, it's a binary thing, and if you > want to allow already having stuff in the buffer, there might be > issues... url-fetch could be defined to replace the current content of the buffer, if that's deemed necessary (i.e. mostly if it needs to use set-buffer-multibyte, which should ideally only ever be used on empty buffers). Stefan