From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Loading" Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:27:31 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87obrzo8qy.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331731679 9684 80.91.229.3 (14 Mar 2012 13:27:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 14 14:27:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S7oF7-0004y1-2x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:27:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59008 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7oF6-0005e0-FK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:27:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37498) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7oEz-0005c2-JQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:27:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7oEo-0005U9-Mf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:27:45 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:13910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S7oEo-0005Ts-IB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:27:34 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAKU/KE9soXdS/2dsb2JhbACBX5x7eYhwnhmDGoJ/BJsZhAk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="167961972" Original-Received: from 108-161-119-82.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([108.161.119.82]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 14 Mar 2012 09:27:32 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D9F23AE08D; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:27:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87obrzo8qy.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:02:45 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149040 Archived-At: > The progress-reporter, spinning in the echo area, is not an option, > because the minibuffer shall be usable. Therefore I'm thinking about to > reactivate the old proposal of a progress-reporter extension, spinning \ > | / in the modeline (more precisely: in `mode-line-remote'). Why mode-line-remote rather than mode-line-process? Stefan