From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r109187: Adjust consing_since_gc when objects are explicitly freed. Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:59:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <500D18D4.7010506@yandex.ru> <500D36C6.7000205@yandex.ru> <500E24D0.2040003@yandex.ru> <500E8CAC.3080303@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343167192 25430 80.91.229.3 (24 Jul 2012 21:59:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 24 23:59:51 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Stn8v-00026s-NG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:59:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45819 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Stn8v-0000us-62 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:59:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34267) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Stn8s-0000uc-3K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:59:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Stn8q-0008JL-W1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:59:46 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:58737) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Stn8q-0008JG-SC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:59:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q6OLxgME016156; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:59:43 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4037FAE2FE; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 17:59:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <500E8CAC.3080303@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:53:16 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4289=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4289> : streams <789865> : uri <1173945> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151865 Archived-At: >> I do not understand how that answers my question. >> So to repeat: do you claim that "decrement consing_since_gc in >> free_marker" helps performance? If so, do you have concrete >> measurements showing it? > With save-restriction patch sent at > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-07/msg00484.html, > is saves ~40 GCs in my "scroll over xdisp.c" test. What about the overall running time. How much is saved by your patch, and how much additional is saved by the "decrement consing_since_gc in free_marker"? Stefan