From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: split-window as a command Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:10:51 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ppy0p4cm.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <5167D3E8.8000903@gmx.at> <87obdkf097.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <51681696.7000405@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365819054 8082 80.91.229.3 (13 Apr 2013 02:10:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 02:10:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Rand Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 13 04:10:58 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UQpve-0006PO-9i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 04:10:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41206 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQpvd-0006we-L7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:10:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQpvZ-0006wV-Ir for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:10:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQpvY-0000vO-Ps for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:10:53 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:20137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQpvY-0000vK-FO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:10:52 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFxIEd/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOkeoFegxM X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFxIEd/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOkeoFegxM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="7309914" Original-Received: from 69-196-129-29.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.129.29]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 12 Apr 2013 22:10:48 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 145EC6A202; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:10:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Rand's message of "Fri, 12 Apr 2013 19:44:31 +0000 (UTC)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158872 Archived-At: > It may be superfluous but it has always been a command and > removing the interactive form would break existing keybindings > and usage. Let's remove the `interactive' spec and see what kind of breakage comes along. Stefan