From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay problems? Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:58:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ppljg4ti.fsf@kanru-mozilla.corp.tpe1.mozilla.com> <5329C53B.3030008@gmx.at> <532ABA60.7000003@gmx.at> <83siqc7n87.fsf@gnu.org> <83a9ck6lzf.fsf@gnu.org> <83eh1v5y53.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5024r1w.fsf@gnu.org> <83ior6489a.fsf@gnu.org> <834n2q43os.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbv62gr7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395626334 24679 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2014 01:58:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 01:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, christian@defun.dk, cloos@jhcloos.com, kanru@kanru.info, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 24 02:59:02 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WRuAI-0003g1-3J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 02:59:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34127 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRuAH-0005DH-Nr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRuA8-00052f-1B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:58:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRuA0-00031b-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:58:51 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:35100) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRuA0-00031V-KY; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:58:44 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s2O1wWWA020057; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:58:32 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 40D786017C; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:58:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83vbv62gr7.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 22 Mar 2014 21:08:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4890=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4890> : inlines <634> : streams <1143618> : uri <1708060> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170895 Archived-At: > I actually don't think we should be bothered about this at all. Why > does it make sense to optimize the use case where a frame is > deiconified? If you have 50 frames, 25 on one desktop and 25 on the other, whenever you switch from one desktop to the other, 25 frames get deiconified and the other 25 get iconified. Stefan