From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal: make up-list escape strings Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 23:56:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: <534482F2.6010504@dancol.org> <5344A698.6080201@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1397015798 5899 80.91.229.3 (9 Apr 2014 03:56:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 03:56:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 09 05:56:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WXjch-0002s4-Ui for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 05:56:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44081 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WXjch-0002XG-MD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 23:56:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WXjcX-0002Go-Uh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 23:56:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WXjcQ-0005ez-FZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 23:56:17 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:55447) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WXjcQ-0005et-AT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 23:56:10 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s393u6Pn003176; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 23:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 19AA3600EC; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 23:56:06 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5344A698.6080201@dancol.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Tue, 08 Apr 2014 18:47:04 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4906=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <4906> : inlines <706> : streams <1154745> : uri <1724357> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171358 Archived-At: >> Why limit this to strings? It makes just as much sense to do it for >> comments, doesn't it? > It's a bit harder to implement for comments (as in, rewrite up-list > using parse-partial-sexp), and I'm not sure it's as useful. Probably not > too bad though. I don't follow you. It doesn't seem hard: just use forward-comment to skip over the comment instead of forward-sexp to skip over the string. Otherwise, the code should be pretty much identical for comments as for strings. Stefan