From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native line numbers landed on master Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:48:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83k23jl5ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2xqo8p7.fsf@lylat> <83lgnxk7v6.fsf@gnu.org> <831spnj6xl.fsf@gnu.org> <83vamyj3bb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499795352 13010 195.159.176.226 (11 Jul 2017 17:49:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:49:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 11 19:49:05 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUzHS-0002mE-4a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:49:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48065 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUzHW-00063O-52 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:49:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53743) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUzGg-00062A-2x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:48:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUzGb-0003UT-30 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:48:14 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:49371) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUzGa-0003RB-Su; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id v6BHm4Y3006667; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:48:04 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E9C50660B0; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:48:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83vamyj3bb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2017 20:23:04 +0300") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6069=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6069> : inlines <5976> : streams <1753754> : uri <2460838> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216495 Archived-At: > As long as we (or, rather, you) tell others to prefer that style, it's > not way down the list. I didn't tell anyone to prefer that style, actually (or at least, I tried to write it such that it doesn't say that, maybe I failed). I just wanted to point out that recentish changes make the difference between 'foo and #'foo slightly more visible and as a result you might like to reconsider your recommendation to strip the #. You might still decide that the # is too ugly to keep it where it's not absolutely needed. Stefan