From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Improving GNU ELPA Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 13:11:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r2xg2wra.fsf@bernoul.li> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1500225148 14683 195.159.176.226 (16 Jul 2017 17:12:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 17:12:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 16 19:12:24 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dWn5g-0003QU-P0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 19:12:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46314 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dWn5m-0007ra-59 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 13:12:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dWn5D-0007rJ-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 13:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dWn5A-00049G-9a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 13:11:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=45851 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dWn5A-000489-2o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 13:11:48 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dWn50-0001H7-Kh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 19:11:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:6EA621JjTUO/gFFD6SKR90OMGWQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216739 Archived-At: > git fetch elpa > git filter-branch That's only for the "subtree" packages. You can use an "external" package, in which case the package has its own branch. > So I think the focus should be on enabling "one repository per package" One repository per package would be a bit more convenient in some cases, admittedly, but one branch per package is not that bad. Stefan