From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lisp primitives and their calling of the change hooks Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:36:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20180107211055.GF22254@ACM> <837est81bl.fsf@gnu.org> <20180108192415.GA5531@ACM> <83h8rw6oio.fsf@gnu.org> <20180109195357.GA3869@ACM> <20180110184521.GB6175@ACM> <20180110194839.GC6175@ACM> <20180110210334.GD6175@ACM> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1515677788 24141 195.159.176.226 (11 Jan 2018 13:36:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 13:36:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 11 14:36:23 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eZd1o-0005i3-1f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 14:36:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43925 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZd3m-0007EI-4P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:38:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51048) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZd2R-0006S6-V2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:37:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZd2O-0007Fr-SK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:47588) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZd2O-0007Ey-NU; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:36:56 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id w0BDatgq021940; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:36:55 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1492E6231F; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:36:55 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20180110210334.GD6175@ACM> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Wed, 10 Jan 2018 21:03:34 +0000") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6198=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6198> : inlines <6304> : streams <1775751> : uri <2568003> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:221830 Archived-At: > is surely negligible, and it is not at all clear that the latter (which > can have simpler hook functions) would be slower than the former (which > may need elaborate special handling). I'm very far from convinced about the "elaborate special handling". Stefan