From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Branch freezing for release Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:23:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871s3jeh8m.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mukyiczg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <877ec2iau1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <4CAA6D9F-0402-489C-8DD1-CE2ADBAA42C9@gnu.org> <87tvf69r16.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <4C62647A-5A71-4C82-9D37-ED933023AFC0@gnu.org> <83pnpt6cf9.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnpt4x0d.fsf@tcd.ie> <83mukx6ayb.fsf@gnu.org> <83lg0h67jb.fsf@gnu.org> <83imvl653m.fsf@gnu.org> <223fd85b-855c-dbbb-315f-9508e348926b@yandex.ru> <835zrk643r.fsf@gnu.org> <83bm1b4sch.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="63361"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers , Dmitry Gutov To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 12 14:27:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hEvH8-000GMZ-41 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 14:27:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35626 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEvH7-0004Ne-2Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:27:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38079) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEvDE-00085m-Ft for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:23:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEvDD-0000Sr-IR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:23:20 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:52992) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEvDD-0000Rz-8y; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:23:19 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x3CCNHtC025676; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:23:17 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0B8886AD96; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:23:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Noam Postavsky's message of "Fri, 12 Apr 2019 06:18:33 -0400") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6523=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6523> : inlines <7052> : streams <1818443> : uri <2830768> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:235335 Archived-At: > Yes, the only way to know is to follow emacs-devel, so for someone who > doesn't follow the list, asking at anything above .90 is the only safe > recommendation, right? What's so bad about using another branch once we're "close to the release"? Stefan