From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why is FUNC in cl-callf not allowed to be an expression? Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 12:47:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874l631ek1.fsf@web.de> <87pnoqtuhm.fsf@web.de> <87r2961gox.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="123218"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 13 18:47:37 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQE6z-000Vtz-3l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:47:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60430 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQE6y-0007rY-0W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 12:47:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38243) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQE6r-0007qN-EG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 12:47:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQE6p-0002ud-Pa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 12:47:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=34178 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQE6p-0002ta-I7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 12:47:27 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQE6m-000VjJ-PX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 18:47:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:v9g+S43ZVrBcAv8Ah7H8wkGvJYU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236468 Archived-At: > (defmacro gv-modify (binding call) Why not (gv-modify VAR PLACE EXP) ? I mean, is there any hope/possibility we'll ever want to extend `binding` to anything else than "a single VAR and a single PLACE"? Or do you actually like having the extra set of parens around the VAR-PLACE pair? Stefan