From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC] size of issue tracker Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 19:31:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1552789070.5272.1@yandex.ru> <87imwhmmt8.fsf@gmail.com> <87y347g1l3.fsf@iotcl.com> <9ac21e82-8e47-f9b5-f88d-23c0c56946d1@yandex.ru> <87pnpc1lby.fsf@iotcl.com> <83zhoezdqc.fsf@gnu.org> <87imuivfcr.fsf@iotcl.com> <83k1eyfxls.fsf@gnu.org> <17D21056-10B2-4813-AE90-9B2706936CE9@icloud.com> <83imuifqjc.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfzehrug.fsf@gmail.com> <83k1exec2n.fsf@gnu.org> <8736lkikqf.fsf@gmail.com> <83y33cb5nc.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7fsf91l.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnongeju.fsf@gnu.org> <763b0765-11ee-e55a-bfb2-df95af84621c@posteo.de> <055FC616-AC66-42EB-8144-2CBFB3C813BA@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="42925"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Clemens Radermacher , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jean-Christophe Helary Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 17 01:31:58 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPqt-000Aui-Jt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 01:31:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38318 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPqs-0004QW-J1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:31:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43311) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPqh-0004O7-1a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:31:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPqg-0004bX-3y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:31:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:16374) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRPqe-0004X0-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:31:40 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A0E7644251C; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:31:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail02.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5767C4424C1; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:31:35 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1558049495; bh=o+N4NBV0mKamHejggB4u+3H7jmOyB2U2J6uvb0L50Bk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=SeHkLqo6uj1uwq0k8lUFgwImjOodYNi7rXrBdBKXQSv7gQb5Yj95CPk5srUfnhY5w UixqFr0bmr1MVAi2g3i7YUc2WRX0ijhU1Jmly+Wd0zP82OL0xjG7k+zpw5s/iyQt+c feXUQE+wkoj5nyKzR5N9NxuqpUeQ+dydBvkjuQYpSxcYF1klHdwe/2l1AAdw6qKF9K 6PfixvNfXxNl6q498NMevu4qOmHKrLF+x49PYsfvioU9fG2ONZEDZNlN53J9MBJXl+ FyPABIAo7ENVTErL06HAYuTnwTK9lsHbi2kGxUriXYKmxwfB6uSrJCiXLX1pOmXaPD NhypSAF+zal4A== Original-Received: from ceviche (69-196-155-191.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.155.191]) by mail02.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 253FC120B2F; Thu, 16 May 2019 19:31:35 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <055FC616-AC66-42EB-8144-2CBFB3C813BA@gmail.com> (Jean-Christophe Helary's message of "Fri, 17 May 2019 08:19:28 +0900") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236608 Archived-At: > I think sourcehut was referenced earlier in the thread. > https://man.sr.ht > It seems to be close to what is needed regarding a mail based workflow. AFAIK it doesn't allow offline use (to clarify, offline use is something I'd like to have, but is not something that's been mentioned as needed to replace debbugs). Stefan