From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: decision on moving core packages to ELPA; also move to obsolete? Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:13:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86a6ugnopl.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83im94b17m.fsf@gnu.org> <834kknatxs.fsf@gnu.org> <83sg86apqb.fsf@gnu.org> <865z52oqfp.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86wnxinbnx.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83o8iuann7.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7omakyw.fsf@gnu.org> <83pn398wol.fsf@gnu.org> <83im918shn.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6ud8qkf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3614"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: daniele@grinta.net, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 16 21:15:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kpdCc-0000pG-9E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 21:15:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34864 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpdCb-0002cZ-Bg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:15:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpdBN-0001et-6h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:13:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:6431) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpdBL-0007b9-3M; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:13:56 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1D04D10023D; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:13:54 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7C2BF100068; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:13:52 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1608149632; bh=j5KauNU6IM+wUDC29XP3FoLgAIMAePvWhZuPkkrWC1w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=IGm7Ps6DpStIYhSf4XyuaJ/8nkWw3ywKLXOm8yBEuegG0d5Fzp2vbpZR+mEyRzWgk IX0Vj9t8rPdXQ8RSnkaCZXmMxlVTjGHpZAh5atgl6J3hs3zD0rTsSdawbS3wg2z7pp /ccwvaJxlIFIpgb3D10s5EF9qf+I9ATN10XJUd4aVzuLiNHIIcQocDO2k+wcd/RYr9 ltCDxI+7Qhjx7Hd1G9PeFg0DK218ggZNewBza8AQr84VfIkWtxZOOWfHdPjB5+2Jhv Ung52Yj41sGh9pAdExkIJvBXEZXuoyl/0mlwGJNXq7AMKL4U7Mv9Jt749TFmYHkgRW nNFUuWFXKL6IA== Original-Received: from alfajor (69-165-136-52.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.165.136.52]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DACF9120408; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:13:51 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83a6ud8qkf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 16 Dec 2020 22:05:20 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:261053 Archived-At: >> >> We will place the submodules under some `elpa` subdirectory of our >> >> choice >> > Why not under lisp/ ? >> Because we don't want it to interfere with the subdirs.el and other >> such things. > What kind of interference are we talking about here? I don't know, I haven't thought about it, but you were worried about it earlier in the thread (where you also mentioned normal-top-level-add-subdirs-* IIRC), so I think you know more than I about that ;-) Stefan