From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding the `prescient` packages to NonGNU ELPA? Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 12:44:08 -0500 Message-ID: References: <16193c73-ab80-04c9-558f-d5e6142f38f3@protonmail.com> <871qpydllo.fsf@posteo.net> <4a52210d-3e39-ed34-a7c9-c3ee6e2a7a68@protonmail.com> <11680a2c-b082-cfce-e075-9694ed06dae0@protonmail.com> <6cda848d-07da-9d8c-fd40-75727915ba3c@protonmail.com> <87fsdngapa.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9785"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Kim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 10 18:44:57 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p43uC-0002KN-Bj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 18:44:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p43tZ-0001Li-Cb; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 12:44:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p43tX-0001La-MY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 12:44:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p43tV-0006hX-Qt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 12:44:15 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5DF08805D5; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 12:44:11 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1315580571; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 12:44:10 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1670694250; bh=3fuPTu+AWcQRMNAPLWIsGX98mqlPmGtvnGSL6WY37J4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=J8Nq8NLFm0fHBgQkcHTJPLIe+g13iRibNQX7MqexAxu7mxA1FEHx4sE22EC87B3BO MgKJQupME8gv1nuDXmIgdNkyrLjRKLKqI98KstnzgTxDIlEx3/B1PKPkExWjAsPPuC iscVLlgo9i7jLxY37UiHJnYCrh6668+0B05I7ZbJ2jhlQEs1AhlUxFajRN29rA3+BX O+ykhoStFzXIRD42Mw/+VqyvBQZYZntMHGEcZ+zdreiciD5dYM8cERuAH9/jc/744G 6FnwjDxxCQtmf6TYLCBp/HDzJnuDmr8h2J2xuzEROjdUG7G8EfkW6WZAA7dLrkJ4AF ekSsWCMT4dsUQ== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.193.52]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFFA71201A2; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 12:44:09 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Kim's message of "Sat, 10 Dec 2022 08:38:51 -0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:301125 Archived-At: > available, so the default value of straight-use-symlinks is nil on > that platform. That causes copying to be used instead, and an advice > is placed on find-file to cause the copied files to act as symlinks if > you try to edit them. Ah, I see. I'm not too keen on hooking directly into find-file, but I guess the `find-library` could be tweaked, indeed. Still. I much prefer the model of "one package per directory" which doesn't require such contortions. Stefan