From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU Emacs: Client/Server Date: 02 Feb 2004 11:01:35 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040129111259.67CF418B@frontend3.messagingengine.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1075742804 15998 80.91.224.253 (2 Feb 2004 17:26:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 17:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 02 18:26:34 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AnhqE-0007h7-00 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 18:26:34 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AnhqD-0004x0-00 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 18:26:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Anhbe-0005Tw-4a for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:11:30 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AnhXs-0004lu-9D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:07:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AnhXG-0004ZZ-Rm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:07:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.24) id 1Anghu-0002Fh-Dg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 11:13:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AngWu-0001Dk-BU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 11:02:34 -0500 Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5916C212CE; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:01:35 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 40A648C6F9; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:01:35 -0500 (EST) Original-To: lorentey@elte.hu (=?utf-8?b?TMWRcmVudGV5IEvDoXJvbHk=?=) In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-1.428, requis 5, BAYES_20 -1.43) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:19664 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:19664 > UNIX domain sockets are useful and secure; I don't see why they should > be abandoned. I have no intention to abandon them. But if people want to add w32 support, they better do it via TCP sockets (which will then also work under unix and will require much less code changes) than some supposedly simple w32-only communication system. Stefan