From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: while-no-input Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:55:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1B3ACCFD5694A94DBA4E231402B0E9ED57AEC2@mucmail1.sdm.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101740171 21551 80.91.229.6 (29 Nov 2004 14:56:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 29 15:56:04 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CYmwc-0000iQ-00 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:56:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CYn61-0000w7-01 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:05:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CYn5r-0000va-6x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:05:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CYn5q-0000uv-Gx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:05:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CYn5q-0000uf-Cr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:05:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CYmw1-0000vW-RM; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:55:25 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700A08282CD; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:55:25 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5AB4AC59A; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:55:12 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B89A68CA69; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:55:12 -0500 (EST) Original-To: In-Reply-To: <1B3ACCFD5694A94DBA4E231402B0E9ED57AEC2@mucmail1.sdm.de> (klaus berndl's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:30:51 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30490 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30490 >> Don't forget that the code within while-no-input is usually code that >> was not specifically designed for while-no-input (otherwise it would >> already use input-pending-p instead). > Hmm, are you sure about that?? About what? > IMHO the code within while-no-input can also be code which would use > input-pending-p already, so my example with performing a VC-state-check I never said otherwise, did I? Stefan