From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (if (and (featurep 'xemacs) blah) not optimized anymore Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:58:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200710201609.l9KG9PFJ006092@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200710220300.l9M30tGB003742@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193029190 21942 80.91.229.12 (22 Oct 2007 04:59:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 22 06:59:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IjpOI-0008BD-AR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:59:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjpOA-0003TC-Oa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:59:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IjpMn-0001bA-P0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IjpMm-0001Z9-5c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjpMl-0001Yv-Sm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:58:16 -0400 Original-Received: from tomts36.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.93] helo=tomts36-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IjpMl-000261-JO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:58:15 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([74.12.205.156]) by tomts36-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20071022045814.GLBF7990.tomts36-srv.bellnexxia.net@ceviche.home> for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:58:14 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 17F9EB4A74; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:58:13 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200710220300.l9M30tGB003742@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Sun\, 21 Oct 2007 20\:00\:55 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81430 Archived-At: > The functions are defined inside a cond. Is the byte compiler supposed > to deal with that? Don't kow about "supposed to", but: No, it doesn't deal with that. Stefan