unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
To: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Cc: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: What primitive has moved point?
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:48:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvskcpka8l.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091107132537.GC5329@muc.de> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Sat,  7 Nov 2009 13:25:37 +0000")

>> > However, if the user gets to brace B with forward-line (e.g., with C-p)
>> > I want to leave point well alone.
>> I think your "feature" will be a misfeature, but if you really really
>> want to implement it, the sanest way is probably to consider not the
>> primitive used, but the direction of the movement: remember point in
>> pre-command-hook, and compare in post-command-hook.  Otherwise: wrap all
>> the relevant primitives (via defadvice, for example) and make them do
>> what you want.
> Actually, users have been complaining for a long time about "alternative"
> parens in branches of #if's not scanning or parsing properly.  I WANT TO
> FIX THIS, difficult though it might be.

I know it's difficult, and it's not even clear what it means in general.

> Maybe this would be a better idea:
> (i) "Neutralize" the syntactic value of every character inside a #define
> or each branch of #if/#elseif/#else apart from the favoured one.  Do this
> neutralization by splatting the area with syntax-table text properties,
> whilst remembering what the "real" properties should be.
> (ii) Each time point enters such a "splatted" region, restore the
> properties.  Also restore them for the purpose of font locking.

Doesn't sound like an attractive solution, since you have to choose one
of the alternatives, and then the user will be surprised when the other
alternatives don't work right.

The "right way" would be to extend syntax-tables so they can jump from
#else to #endif (or to #if when going backwards).

> (iii) Each time point leaves such a region, splat the properties again.
> What do you think?

I also think down this way lies madness.  It's just piling up hacks over
hacks, and while it may improve some behaviors it will screw up others.


        Stefan




  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-08  2:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-06 11:48 What primitive has moved point? Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-06 15:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-07 13:25   ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-08  2:48     ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2009-11-17 23:56       ` Alan Mackenzie
2009-11-07 12:39 ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jwvskcpka8l.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
    --to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    --cc=acm@muc.de \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).