From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: System calls without error checks in w32 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:56:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4C037EFE.4040304@gmx.de> <87zkz9qu2r.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <4C0CCBCE.8080503@gmx.de> <87k4qa99l4.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275940591 23527 80.91.229.12 (7 Jun 2010 19:56:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , Jason Rumney , grischka , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 07 21:56:29 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLiQu-0004Pj-NQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 21:56:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42038 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OLiQu-00062g-80 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:56:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44663 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OLiQn-00060s-St for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:56:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLiQm-00059S-Nr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:56:21 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:7534 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLiQm-00059L-Kf; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:56:20 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAOvrDExFpYBi/2dsb2JhbACeHXLATYUXBIxn X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,380,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="67536816" Original-Received: from 69-165-128-98.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.128.98]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 07 Jun 2010 15:56:19 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4C0198175; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:56:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Mon, 7 Jun 2010 17:23:03 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125607 Archived-At: > threads. And why does not C-g break all looping, even those in timers > (like fontification)? That is simply because timer code is normally run in a way that's completely hidden from the user, so if the user happens to hit C-g while a timer is running, it's probably not because he wants to interrupt the timer, but rather because he wants to interrupt the thing he's currently doing. Timers (and fontification, post-command-hook, ...) should run quickly, or otherwise re-enable interrupts using with-local-quit. Stefan