From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Convert non-ASCII letters to hexadecimal? vs control chars. Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:22:24 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87fww040oi.fsf@jidanni.org> <83tykf8m6i.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287717758 25478 80.91.229.12 (22 Oct 2010 03:22:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:22:38 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 22 05:22:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P98DE-00079A-7y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 05:22:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59688 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P98DD-0006ms-C5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:22:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35404 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P98D8-0006lx-RG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:22:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P98D4-0003UJ-Kx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:22:30 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:55338 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P98D4-0003UE-J1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:22:26 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApQKADegwEzO+IF0/2dsb2JhbACTbYx3enK+FIVKBJId X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,221,1286164800"; d="scan'208";a="80375814" Original-Received: from 206-248-129-116.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.129.116]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 21 Oct 2010 23:22:24 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 90AC4A845E; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:22:24 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 21 Oct 2010 23:26:40 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131966 Archived-At: >> Yes. And if not, then it's a separate problem. > So you're fine with just removing the "encode in hex" question? Not sure I understand, but I'm fine with sending random bytes, without removing them first and without asking the user, yes. We can either assume they'll get QP or base64 encoded down the line or that it doesn't matter. Stefan