From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: post-command-hook Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 21:09:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4D95F608.8020501@gmx.at> <87mxk8mg88.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301879419 25826 80.91.229.12 (4 Apr 2011 01:10:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 01:10:19 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 04 03:10:12 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6YJ1-0003YY-4W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 03:10:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43646 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q6YIu-00009Z-Uj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 21:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59187 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q6YIp-0008Vj-Go for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 21:10:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6YIn-0008V7-M3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 21:09:58 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:60371 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q6YIn-0008UZ-I7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2011 21:09:57 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq4HANEZmU1Ld/gU/2dsb2JhbACYW4x/eIhyB7ZXhWsElj8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,294,1299474000"; d="scan'208";a="102987780" Original-Received: from 75-119-248-20.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.248.20]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 03 Apr 2011 21:09:56 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6C94E58DF1; Sun, 3 Apr 2011 21:09:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87mxk8mg88.fsf@gnu.org> ("Johan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bockg=E5rd=22?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?'s?= message of "Sun, 03 Apr 2011 00:38:15 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138095 Archived-At: > Shouldn't the "return nil" be in safe_run_hook_funcall instead? Indeed, thanks for caching it before I committed it, Stefan