From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The rest of xVARs Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:18:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <50214432.5040906@yandex.ru> <50235543.3000501@yandex.ru> <5023F621.1020107@yandex.ru> <502499F9.9030204@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344611915 10836 80.91.229.3 (10 Aug 2012 15:18:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 10 17:18:35 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Szqyv-0002Le-3u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:18:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51219 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Szqyu-0007JS-4s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:18:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37039) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Szqyr-0007Fr-DS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:18:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Szqyp-0007JA-FS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:18:29 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:59541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Szqyp-0007J3-BS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:18:27 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q7AFIQjj001350; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 516F5B4177; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:18:26 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <502499F9.9030204@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:19:53 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4306=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4306> : streams <797209> : uri <1188942> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152413 Archived-At: >>>>> I can't continue without solving (B|K)VARs issue, and X = B->field/ >>>>> BSET(B, field, X) is enough for my purposes; >>>> You can split the BVAR into a BGET and BSET for now. >>> OK, the patch is > 200K uncompressed. >> Here's a simpler solution: split BVAR into BVAR and BSET. I'm sure the >> patch will substantially smaller and hence cause much fewer conflicts. > OK Looks good, feel free to install. >> Stefan "tired of resolving cosmetic conflicts with your patches" > Coccinelle tends to eat spaces and tabs (especially between function > name and '(' opens an argument list),so I do quite a lot of manual > adjustments to fit our coding style; but sometimes I can miss the > poorly formatted entry :-(. You've done a great job of adjusting it seems, since all the conflicts I got were always due to real (tho usually cosmetic, such as introducing/removing FVAR) changes. Stefan "hovering between 1MB and 2MB of local changes, many of them cosmetic"