From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: inlinable functions instead of macros Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:48:50 -0400 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345247338 8080 80.91.229.3 (17 Aug 2012 23:48:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:48:58 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 18 01:48:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T2WHi-0006d8-8E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 01:48:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42043 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2WHh-0000G2-6S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:48:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2WHf-0000Fw-9J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:48:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2WHe-0001MH-Ed for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:48:55 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:45312) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2WHe-0001MC-9p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:48:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q7HNmpCJ019657; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:48:52 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E334AAE2F8; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:48:50 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: * X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered SUBJ_5_WRD_LC_W_NO_HTTP=1, RV4313=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4313> : streams <801283> : uri <1195212> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152627 Archived-At: While inlinable functions are much cleaner than macros, they have a very serious downside: you just end up with lisp.h:2416: Emacs fatal error: assertion failed: found == !EQ (blv->defcell, blv->valcell) I.e. the file&line info is always the same rather than giving the file&line where the inlinable function was called. Stefan