From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: selected-frame and selected-window Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:53:32 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83fw45xxzk.fsf@gnu.org> <83ehjpxwqd.fsf@gnu.org> <838v9xxss8.fsf@gnu.org> <83zk2dvsba.fsf@gnu.org> <83ip90w48g.fsf@gnu.org> <4AB1E6AB8BB448AAB037D70CBECBFD9D@us.oracle.com> <83d2z8w2na.fsf@gnu.org> <837gpgvz81.fsf@gnu.org> <83txrwloiz.fsf@gnu.org> <83ip8bdgtt.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355500424 2111 80.91.229.3 (14 Dec 2012 15:53:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 14 16:53:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjXaE-0003vy-14 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:53:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38444 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjXa1-0001EN-1l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:53:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53291) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjXZy-0001EC-2G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:53:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjXZw-0006E2-VT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:53:37 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjXZw-0006Dy-Rm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:53:36 -0500 Original-Received: from 216-123-190-91.dedicated.allstream.net ([216.123.190.91]:50973 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjXZv-0007GI-7h; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:53:35 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B1138660E0; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:53:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83ip8bdgtt.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 09 Dec 2012 05:50:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155554 Archived-At: >> The rest of my message mentioned reasons why the equality is >> sometimes broken. > Yes, I know. But a broken assertion is a candidate for removal, IMO. Agreed. >> Now, I tend to consider that those cases should be considered bugs, >> because IIRC there are cases where we do rely on this equality. > If you or someone else can describe those cases, we could use that > knowledge to modify the assertion or fix the bugs which violate it. I did describe them. I actually just installed a tentative fix for those problems. Stefan