From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r101338: * lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el (syntax-ppss): More sanity check to catch Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:59:46 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87r47bi1e5.fsf@yandex.ru> <52F96284.50507@yandex.ru> <52FAE12B.6060101@yandex.ru> <52FC3BEE.60604@yandex.ru> <87bnyb6s7w.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392307210 2867 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2014 16:00:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:00:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 13 17:00:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDyi0-0006HY-SZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:00:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47257 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDyi0-0004UN-G6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:00:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDyhq-0004QX-6U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:00:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDyhi-0000Wx-UQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:00:06 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:63541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDyhX-0000S0-CR; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:59:47 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFLd+mu/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYHCxQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFLd+mu/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYHCxQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="47544828" Original-Received: from 75-119-233-174.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.233.174]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 13 Feb 2014 10:59:46 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 55FAD6007C; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:59:46 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87bnyb6s7w.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:46:11 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169586 Archived-At: > Using different modes on a buffer would seem like a rather canonical use > case for indirect buffers. If they don't work well for that, one needs > to think about _what_ would work better. While it can be "good enough" for some particular uses, overall they don't work well for that use case. > That may mean improving indirect buffers or creating something > different. In which case one should recheck whether indirect buffers > work well for _anything_. AFAIC they don't work well for anything. As for creating something different, well that's what mmm-mode is doing. Stefan