From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: trunk r116426: * lisp/jit-lock.el (jit-lock-mode): Keep it disabled in indirect buffers. Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 16:40:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1396906018 24647 80.91.229.3 (7 Apr 2014 21:26:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 21:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: joaotavora@gmail.com (=?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?=) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 07 23:26:51 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WXH47-0005aF-9P for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 23:26:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36933 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WXH46-0004zI-TP for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:26:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43141) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WXH3m-0004yQ-1z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:26:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WXH3e-0008T4-KJ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:26:30 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:41895) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WXH3e-0008Sq-Ey; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:26:22 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s37LPj1Y028423; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 17:25:46 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3F16066099; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 16:40:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Jo=E3o_T=E1v?= =?windows-1252?Q?ora=22's?= message of "Mon, 07 Apr 2014 19:34:38 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4905=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <4905> : inlines <696> : streams <1153639> : uri <1723269> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:97035 gmane.emacs.devel:171330 Archived-At: > I don't know anything about fontification techniques, so I don't even > know if the question makes sense, but isn't there a way to get > fontification (even if slower than jit-lock-mode) in the indirect > buffer, and keep the base buffer jit-locked? Everything is possible, yes. But I just recommend you don't go there, it's a waste of time. Stefan