From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r117576: Reorder conditions that are written backwards Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:21:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87tx63t4t5.fsf@igel.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1406481707 11342 80.91.229.3 (27 Jul 2014 17:21:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 17:21:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 27 19:21:39 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XBS8h-0008SN-3p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 19:21:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35742 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBS8g-00065F-Ji for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:21:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47585) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBS8V-0005ul-Uf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:21:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBS8O-0005j0-GD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:21:27 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-pri-01.vtxnet.net ([212.147.62.135]:42398) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBS8O-0005iu-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:21:20 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-pri-01.vtxnet.net (VTX Services SA) with ESMTP id 895BECFD0C; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 17:21:19 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from smtp-pri-01.vtxnet.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp-pri-01.vtxnet.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Dbv2YNFqCmX; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 19:21:17 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (dyn.83-228-141-040.dsl.vtx.ch [83.228.141.40]) by smtp-pri-01.vtxnet.net (VTX Services SA) with ESMTP id 4AB4BCFD04; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 19:21:17 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 31DFBAE1BC; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:21:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87tx63t4t5.fsf@igel.home> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:32:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 212.147.62.135 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173180 Archived-At: >> Why is this better? > It follows the natural way the conditions are expressed. I don't see it. Stefan