From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: handling of completion table duplicates Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 10:09:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87h9fiewnf.fsf@acer.localhost.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459692602 32287 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2016 14:10:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 14:10:02 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 03 16:09:53 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1amiiu-0005Fr-AW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 16:09:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53614 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amiit-0001MT-GC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 10:09:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54767) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amiip-0001MA-CG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 10:09:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amiim-00085K-71 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 10:09:47 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amiim-00085G-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 10:09:44 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1amiik-0005BW-C1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 16:09:42 +0200 Original-Received: from 69-165-138-79.dsl.teksavvy.com ([69.165.138.79]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 16:09:42 +0200 Original-Received: from monnier by 69-165-138-79.dsl.teksavvy.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 16:09:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 8 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 69-165-138-79.dsl.teksavvy.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:GKLwBKgQ4fLxg/dTRRlePOTUbp0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202621 Archived-At: > Is removing duplicates from the collection *expected* from completion > functions, or is the caller of the function responsible for providing a > collection without duplicates? It's the generic completion code that's responsible for that, yes. Stefan