From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Preview: portable dumper Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2016 09:08:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878trydrbo.fsf@red-bean.com> <83a8cem1eq.fsf@gnu.org> <83zikdl7oo.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3zxkwms.fsf@gnu.org> <20161203143603.GA6921@acm.fritz.box> <43e8a279-3278-817b-7cd4-b669c5ae320b@yandex.ru> <20161204123434.GB2791@acm.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480860527 31669 195.159.176.226 (4 Dec 2016 14:08:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 14:08:47 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 04 15:08:42 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDXT7-0007Om-SN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 15:08:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34628 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDXTA-0004Sk-1M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 09:08:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37759) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDXT3-0004ST-PK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 09:08:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDXT0-0000Jf-Gq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 09:08:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=58625 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDXT0-0000JW-AK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 09:08:34 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDXSt-0005cT-Vl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2016 15:08:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:MOos75Ygp63oruK66HCGcUpTdFI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:210020 Archived-At: > Your patch was indeed simpler. Indeed, it was so simple as actually not > to work in general, as well as being ~2 orders of magnitude slower than > the current (forward-comment -1). You make it sound like it barely ever works and it's always 100 times slower. I think this qualifies as "gross misrepresentation". Stefan