From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Improving GNU ELPA Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:35:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r2xg2wra.fsf@bernoul.li> <87pod02swk.fsf@bernoul.li> <8760eqxdko.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1500385264 23368 195.159.176.226 (18 Jul 2017 13:41:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 13:41:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 18 15:40:56 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dXSk6-0005W9-KX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:40:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56560 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXSkB-0007jd-T9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:40:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32941) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXSjc-0007jY-3k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:40:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXSjX-0006nO-EJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:40:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=35408 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dXSjX-0006nC-7G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:40:15 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dXSjN-0003Cj-C9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:40:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:dxuQEMEnXIPXpDXdG0MIwlkyS6E= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216826 Archived-At: > If I could push to upstream, it would be simpler, but still require > merges. AFAIU, what you mean by "merges" is simply the result of changes being made both to the github repository and to the elpa.git repository. It's unrelated to how the copy of dash kept on the gnu.org side is stored (a subtree, or a separate branchm or a separate repository) as long as it can be modified on the gnu.org side. Right? Stefan