From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Naming predicates (was: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format)
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:06:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvsh1twldg.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.devel@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3356af4b-f6f5-e353-6162-a5fa8880d223@cs.ucla.edu
>> Shouldn't this be `time-equal-p', as we have already `time-less-p'?
> Thanks, as a Scheme refugee I never can remember which predicates should end
> in "-p" vs "p" vs nothing. I installed the attached.
The rule is not that bad: use a "-p or p" suffix whenever a Schemer
would use a "?" suffix. As for when to use "-p" vs just "p" I'd say you
can simply always use "-p" when it's something you define.
Stefan "who likes Scheme's ?, ->, and ! naming conventions"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-28 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20180925021527.10418.61555@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <20180925021528.9A119204E8@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
2018-09-25 10:09 ` master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format Michael Albinus
2018-09-26 1:09 ` Paul Eggert
2018-09-26 9:24 ` Michael Albinus
2018-09-26 9:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-09-26 9:43 ` Michael Albinus
2018-09-27 20:46 ` Paul Eggert
2018-09-28 6:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-09-28 10:26 ` Michael Albinus
2018-09-28 17:27 ` Paul Eggert
2018-09-29 13:35 ` Michael Albinus
2018-09-28 14:45 ` Paul Eggert
2018-09-28 14:54 ` Michael Albinus
2018-09-28 1:50 ` Paul Eggert
2018-09-28 10:35 ` Michael Albinus
2018-09-28 17:39 ` Paul Eggert
2018-09-28 18:06 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2018-09-28 18:28 ` Naming predicates (was: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format) Drew Adams
2018-09-28 19:12 ` Paul Eggert
2018-09-28 19:26 ` Naming predicates Stefan Monnier
2018-09-28 19:40 ` Drew Adams
2018-09-28 19:41 ` Naming predicates (was: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format) Drew Adams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwvsh1twldg.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.devel@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).