From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Auto de-composition when point is inside a composition Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:08:24 -0400 Message-ID: References: <835zki2ic9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="68308"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Kenichi Handa , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 21 21:20:01 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMdDl-000Hc9-1E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 21:20:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47050 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMdDj-0006Py-O5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:19:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58161) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMd2i-0004pv-Mb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:08:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMd2h-0002Oo-Az for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:08:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:11957) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMd2d-0002Mr-Uz; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:08:33 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C2736449223; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:08:30 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A3D65449221; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:08:29 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1571684909; bh=iKbK3jyr5s6JlipVCzi/ZN0Za+vQTjsGe3QlGPFZtwI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZLG4E8DMabWnHGSeq4CxQUEUyFJlNXuIB9w7HW8OiHMch9gykfVFzrM+2Upr2RxTg hfWglR1EfAkioqv+KvCyNouOyxmX6jzvZGOFSxQ8yHhF51rK0FeH4PJwc9g4is5C20 WHtBrS2ulEhF0HRbQ5NHkdObfDedVlY+gJbu1UCunTX0CsX2hHKfvc6zNm4fE8aNbX VDF7wBqq9g9tCNRkxeJrg4YskGdeTzd8JNa7J6MfH+4lfpwIlRM7NHo66N03xnJRNs wV77FrOF/5hAF8ZKAQVs6yaRFcwdFN5SHNKXZEPTmxVnb5lTvqXHweYaHcmTmV+8K9 3z6ZoOncpaRyw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.30.71]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13940120E9F; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:08:28 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:43:32 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241322 Archived-At: >> Maybe because otherwise the redisplay optimizations taken in case only >> point moved could fail to redisplay (they might only redraw the >> character at point, and fail to include the rest of the composition)? > > But in that case, if the command that moved point set > disable-point-adjustment to non-nil, we'd have a redisplay error, no > (since we'd then skip this chunk of code). ^ That should have been a question mark Stefan