From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 10:43:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <834ku43c61.fsf@gnu.org> <83k12zz6ds.fsf@gnu.org> <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> <20200403174757.GA8266@ACM> <20200405111623.GB5049@ACM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="90466"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: acm@muc.de, eliz@gnu.org, rrandresf@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 06 16:43:43 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLSyV-000NTJ-8B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 16:43:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32976 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLSyU-0005aA-B3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 10:43:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34351) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLSxx-0005BL-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 10:43:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLSxw-0002BG-66 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 10:43:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:20009) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLSxu-0002A6-QM; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 10:43:06 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D109E810F8; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 10:43:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1599480374; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 10:43:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1586184184; bh=7wpDq923I6otmnwZl9yz2XgCxzAiBbJoeoTQEVSEwao=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=NsjSeqb3tIUiGBEsAz9fYsTfuF2sEiyPgwGsDBloUKET6d1i1Ai+4nUYyoTGPPWTY eKeZ0XDsb/jTht5DlvEz/wvRVJwUlifU7ovVtsdswOWX2XhNQVZe0KkjHFcbg2yPBl 4OMwSg+SM7RYaz5AcIbJIEawURTxlsBWP5WnGv0jk6PCHf2BSIKJD2Y4d7WbzGUiXY Y+3jdV12+iXvrRP7ZIm3y2wtdyXs6V0OzyJeF4MkArDXmkJxV+A3OAlaPZ7j7Jajmf miEdCfJseqcs8gjfYx94Q4Styx+5LyVOiREQYVmhBZYhT/2ehhLLy/SRpZHaTqbaFl 6YZOsAHcrkz4g== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.114]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1EEB1203C7; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 10:43:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun, 05 Apr 2020 22:36:25 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246527 Archived-At: > > Indeed. And the reverse is true as well: while it might be OK for > > a user to put his open-parens in column 0 to help Emacs be more > > responsive, it's not OK for Emacs to be too slow on files where there > > are no such open-parens in column 0. So Emacs has to use some other > > mechanism anyway to avoid the slowdown in such files. > > The mechanism it has now is effective only on fast machines. Do you have any evidence to back that claim? Stefan "whose main work machines are Core 2 Duo"