From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers! Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:36:56 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20201119104035.GB6259@ACM> <9aacff47-8ac2-93a2-5112-6153ee986b57@gmx.at> <20201120210005.GA1034@ACM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25035"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: martin rudalics , Eli Zaretskii , enometh@meer.net, Andrii Kolomoiets , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 20 22:45:34 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kgEDm-0006Oy-1I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 22:45:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53940 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgEDl-0000NP-3I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:45:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgE5X-0004MR-NH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:40873) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgE5V-0004ko-62; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6E02744159F; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:36:59 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 186024411FA; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:36:58 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1605908218; bh=L4CgMZmLvY95/gjBZwUiy0IFrJXYUjpVN1kUvE9QYdc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=pMDB2ujLf1Wwxbh3gUabdUsSPLecm1tUttfVoq7lBAyBUEc66GkxBj9DQAaraMnpa rpZVTzBf3hYuMzpK0o3cqqRCtJtliqRjqAy5rt5gFYmSNQCAPqbj07dg5TOe9MLFUL HkaVI5mW7XMM+iN0phTDMmsKGPy9x97/3oUF1lpqDnakkPeowirMf0LEApGUVbg8B3 jjva+0dEzsTDvbM9vHKXXMGLM4nK545yZyrJ9XshLJmktepO1euyKeYHYRj82aXXjE +uapzkOtIqDLmOdL5u0Q21Fr7fwfgCmdT1TKj6X9z2vU+IaLFui0F/k9JOuNrS8bcs SmU586p14uE4A== Original-Received: from alfajor (69-165-136-52.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.165.136.52]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A99A2120328; Fri, 20 Nov 2020 16:36:57 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20201120210005.GA1034@ACM> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Fri, 20 Nov 2020 21:00:05 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:259505 Archived-At: >> (setq default-frame-alist '((minibuffer . nil))) >> >> (defun foo () >> (interactive) >> (read-from-minibuffer "...?") >> (insert (format "%s" (selected-frame)))) [...] > However, if I type (frame-list) into *scratch* and do C-x C-e I get only > one frame in the list, and it has the same address in the # > output as the " *Minibuf-1* 0xxxx" output. Hmm... any chance you've missed the (setq default-frame-alist '((minibuffer . nil))) or you executed it too late? There *should* be 2 frames in the above recipe, one being a minibuffer-only frame. Stefan