From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 0161c9d 1/2: Load all generic-x.el modes unconditionally Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:17:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20210209160550.18823.10795@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83czx8k3gn.fsf@gnu.org> <83sg64hqzj.fsf@gnu.org> <83im6zj1bo.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0reh6l6.fsf@gnu.org> <83eehmh07n.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2ftg4hm.fsf@gnu.org> <83eehlfiy8.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6s9fhpm.fsf@gnu.org> <831rdlfg4t.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7490"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, stefan@marxist.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 12 17:23:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lAbE4-0001oR-Io for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:23:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56450 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAbE3-00070b-IS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:23:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59684) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAb8U-0001Pp-6Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:17:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:26555) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lAb8S-0001e3-0A; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:17:37 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 20D44100225; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:17:33 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B084F100062; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:17:31 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1613146651; bh=BKsS3TjUiLkrmjLtGjoGH9sy7MIyXDcHXeILRbqpX9Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=MErPhgIENJxmreDwJ+atTTmdvuRiI9b7aIThcWtBDdNS29rAFQewnLQMCFARd2H/q 0VA/Hgny8AjTdywmI9a+lHBDPCdilZDr7Mv1Z3bCRyyGZV3HfiCTXMPrlRV38CQaYs yII0Yv1T2AzNSKyUfd2jVG7aIosbfaXMjjXefYcUj3BsQGhiv8RhkmF9Hjkb+wRQJC NH+9UCvgYZ1PXeAEOF+7zEx+tTxA3GxucaKpUFvf9fYemVGD+snVdHjfqHIPlipff6 yb9wF2auT4kSJHQP+B51hLB9JpkyZyg1PFJxXRGjJ6ksEZKongQv7h0rIaHe0EGOKc bYTYlr1d7VHRg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.41.47]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78C59120278; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:17:31 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <831rdlfg4t.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:41:06 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264524 Archived-At: > Didn't I say that I'm okay with the former? It's fun to argue, I > know, but since we agree, do we have to continue? > > I only mentioned reverting the whole changeset because I sensed Stefan > Kangas was leaning towards it. Ah, OK, sorry, I misunderstood. Then we're in violent agreement. Stefan