From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:01:41 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87a6sbg41o.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfatirk1.fsf@gnus.org> <83blbpmy2x.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmdmw60.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188eac8da31543@heytings.org> <30f0a4188e796ef64509@heytings.org> <496380cc60478547e162@heytings.org> <496380cc6050c3dcb765@heytings.org> <496380cc60c39dd43419@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22784"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 17:26:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkc9-0005kU-I4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:26:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60336 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkc8-000769-HQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:26:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkEa-0008PS-HH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:01:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:8387) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKkEX-0002d0-6K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:01:51 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F0F74440C4A; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:01:43 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C7CB9440C46; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:01:42 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1615564902; bh=NxiyGpqfNH6NBcxO3xnC9Kk16bsd2W8knjbQODB1UJk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=VInQEpgJCtU6y9vWVpuXEucekLcsl/t1St8yBq/Mfx0Y/Rvmf9uB1ZX28rgsyapRS U/fMw3itZBKs1ETD7T3AwikSj/67KUiZPIaBqffHjyJAgzWfmBjgW+5PAGmP57ZoQD 10OApVOMWEz/AaPK5LnMF/+OyInViDfbmpi26VfcVcDXd4pv2xe+3ZGaiePHVo4zKA NjrO4c7aR+WEkVW3C8CneKGFKrp/liQEllnyh7jiOUkPqXpYVTVGanO7cN0LIHrgBb UjkUkO8LF5DJYDXlQcAFD1pCQJvre60BQqAmi0jLTKYlpUXptwSiUDBxUMt5MRQpNS tecI+2qS8+W5w== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.43.249]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7EB41202C1; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:01:42 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <496380cc60c39dd43419@heytings.org> (Gregory Heytings's message of "Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:20:05 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266407 Archived-At: >>> (defun font-lock-update (&optional arg) >>> (interactive "P") >>> (save-mark-and-excursion >>> (if (not arg) >>> (font-lock-fontify-region (point-min) (point-max)) >>> (font-lock-unfontify-region (point-min) (point-max)) >>> (font-lock-mode 'toggle)))) >>> (global-set-key (kbd "C-x x f") 'font-lock-update) >> No, if you start with that you will end with what we have. > Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. That its behavior is defined by its implementation. E.g. I find the current behavior to be a bug when font-lock-mode is disabled in an elisp-mode buffer and your code would be similarly buggy. Stefan