From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 'M-o' ('facemap-keymap') has now been removed until March 10th 2021 Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:40:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <32A55BBD-1A3F-4EC4-817F-7C3408C22A65@bydasein.com> <22aaf0faddac64397c7d@heytings.org> <4B2A00EB-8C04-4B9D-BA86-692D67207AFD@bydasein.com> <22aaf0faddc2bf87fd3a@heytings.org> <0009872A-AD9D-4B08-B714-BFEDDAAF9125@bydasein.com> <8786a8e8faf45a989904@heytings.org> <8786a8e8faa6f278b198@heytings.org> <340C1C00-D6DE-46AF-99ED-ED349E8F8D4F@bydasein.com> <035AB19F-E25F-42A2-9961-D18CC2F281F3@bydasein.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24317"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Gregory Heytings , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Paul W. Rankin" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 24 16:42:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lP5e7-0006EQ-Od for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:42:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50446 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lP5e6-0002dQ-PW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:42:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46906) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lP5cr-0001jf-99 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:40:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:41543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lP5co-0006uP-RK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:40:52 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B407F805B2; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:40:49 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2302580194; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:40:48 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1616600448; bh=65UN/AoYUk+PpY06uBKZ1Ka8HbVZr0sWwQzuWgn3y5o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Gtg3B1Twstl1+zv0I5H3JDVa3acYSCUC6s4JbfALmJhzzGQ+NvsguXpY4/yUBHUaM khdK2ekItsaB6YAIlSVobQZMCEr6158KdjgLMRh1jmA81CpeM+co0KePvGSo94jigT paI3Imz6LoSDHf3vwqvGyYWE2JS8bub9lIFtWPwC96csFpTj0o/U6rh4zZhgTj7GuB o9MArklCprpDxLgTR8wNvygfD/I3j3Y4ELMx62ZlWQIfLsERwCCPC+dKVqCFdVv2E5 b/IBAKAoEfL0/S+rMXDOvUZTkPkdBH7CQDH2k/fKv+t7I+5bv1v1DCLQlqLmzp651l OQYUOx+gPOGuw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.43.249]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6EEC1204E9; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:40:47 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <035AB19F-E25F-42A2-9961-D18CC2F281F3@bydasein.com> (Paul W. Rankin's message of "Thu, 25 Mar 2021 01:38:39 +1000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266965 Archived-At: > I'm responding to a very narrow issue Gregory raised, which was that yanking > a defun from an emacs-lisp-mode into a text-mode-buffer, then deactivating > font-lock-mode did not remove what he considers to be fontification. To me, > this makes sense because text-mode does not fontify most text, thus any text Yes, but the question is not whether it makes sense but whether it's desirable. If it's not desirable than it doesn't matter whether we provide/preserve this behavior. Stefan